Writing as Awareness: Forgiving George Orwell

A paradox of fiction writing (and perhaps too of reading) is the power of the storytelling to make us more aware of our real worlds. As the painter studies a subject and seeks to understand each detail of light, color, and shape, so we, when we write, are looking into things’ hearts and seeking the truth of them, to distill into our stories. This is a paradox because of the explicit unreality of fiction, yet from realistic fiction to fantasy, it is the integrity of the vision, that is, the text’s ability to portray shards of the world lifted and rearranged in a rich, true light–it is this I think the best writing does for us.

A brightly-lit house against a dark sky.
At six o’clock last Monday morning, my husband and I made our way down to campus, where Tibetan students organized a Losar celebration, the Tibetan new year.

In the second-year literature course I’m teaching now, I reviewed with students the last weeks three texts they had studied the year before with another teacher: Nineteen Eighty-four, The Penelopiad, and Miss Julie. Only the second of these I might have ever dreamed of teaching myself. Miss Julie is an awful, anti-feminist play. Nineteen Eighty-four has always felt so dead depressing to me–it’s one of the few books I really have longed to throw across a room.

It is this, Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four, against which I think I must retract, or at least temper my judgement. Orwell the man, or Eric Blair as his real name was, wrote the novel of suffering in great suffering himself. In the early post-WWII era, shortly after Orwell’s wife’s untimely death, when, mourning, a colleague offered the journalist the use of his remote house on the Scottish island of Jura, Orwell worked feverishly, against his agent’s and publisher’s deadlines, and he slowly wasted away of tuberculosis as he wrote. Orwell died shortly after the novel’s publication. You can read more about the writing of the novel here. The darkness of those years for Orwell is surely part of what we receive in the darkness of the text.

Snow falling through the light of a lamppost at night, houses in the distance.
Returning home, the snow began.

But it is far from about Orwell alone. His vision shows us truth of the external world. Nineteen Eighty-four consistently appears on and sometimes tops lists of the most important novels of the 20th Century. It is prophetic in its vision, from the slow attrition of the Cold War to modern-day governmental and corporate surveillance. Orwell’s insistence on challenging the core beliefs that keep us content–most centrally the true independence of our own minds and love and beliefs–that no matter what an oppressor might do to us, our minds will always be our own. Orwell rips this comforting belief away. It’s probably the core reason why I’ve detested the book. But what I can understand is, it is a signal from Orwell that I, that we must all, look deeper.

Orwell’s vision was not his alone. In fact, significant elements of the plot and themes of Nineteen Eighty-four were pilfered unceremoniously from Soviet writer Yevgeny Zamyatin’s earlier novel We, years after Orwell published a book review of it. It is all, then, a kind of human conversation. Each one of us answers to the other. Every person’s ideas contribute to the whole’s , or they should, provided each person’s voice is listened to. I think of the Walt Whitman line, brought to me by Robin Williams in Dead Poets Society:

That you are here—that life exists and identity,
That the powerful play goes on, and you may contribute a verse.

Tangled branches in a forest at night, with snow and a lamppost.
The forest in the early morning. There are our footprints, going down, then coming up.

I’m glad I’ve taken a look back at Nineteen Eighty-four. I’m sure I’ll never call myself a fan, but I can appreciate its relevance to the world, and take a lesson here or there from it for myself. This feels appropriate and good.

With love,

One thought on “Writing as Awareness: Forgiving George Orwell

Add yours

  1. Hi Jimmo, Wanted to make a few comments about last Sunday’s blog. I was surprised to find out how much you hated the novel, “1984”! This is ONE novel that I ACTUALLY READ…and I really liked it, even though it was disturbing to think of a world really like that. Humph! I read the entire article on the writing of “1984”, and found it most interesting. I wonder if George Orwell (a.k.a.Eric Blair) hadn’t been so tortured with poor health, isolation, and depression from losing his wife, if his novel wouldn’t have been quite so stark & scary. You know, your novel, *Migration,* had similarities to “1984” (GASP!) in the way the government was “Big Brother” over everyones’ thoughts and actions 😠. Were you, as the author of “Migration”, influenced by “1984” or “The Handsmaid Tale”?

    Love, M


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑

Create your website at WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: